Back to What's NewEnvironmental Impact Assessment Reforms Proposed
EU Accession

Environmental Impact Assessment Reforms Proposed

6 min read

New draft legislation would strengthen EIA requirements for large infrastructure projects, aligning North Macedonia with EU Directive 2011/92/EU on environmental assessments.

Key Points

Mandatory EIA Expansion

The draft law expands mandatory EIA requirements to cover all projects above 5M EUR, down from the current 15M EUR threshold.

Public Consultation Required

All EIA processes must include a 45-day public consultation period with at least two public hearings in affected municipalities.

Independent Review Board

A new independent EIA Review Board will assess reports, replacing the current system where the Ministry alone approves assessments.

Digital Transparency

All EIA documents, public comments, and decisions must be published on a centralized online portal accessible to all citizens.

Why EIA Reform Matters

Environmental Impact Assessments are one of the most important tools for preventing environmental damage from development projects. A well-functioning EIA system ensures that the environmental consequences of major projects -- highways, factories, shopping centers, energy installations -- are assessed before construction begins, and that the public has a meaningful voice in the decision-making process. North Macedonia's current EIA legislation, last updated in 2011, has significant gaps compared to EU standards. The threshold for mandatory assessment is too high (allowing many impactful projects to proceed without full review), public participation provisions are weak, and there is no independent oversight of the assessment process.

Key Changes in the Draft Legislation

The proposed reforms address the three main weaknesses of the current system. First, the mandatory EIA threshold drops from 15M EUR to 5M EUR, meaning that approximately 3-4 times as many projects annually will require full environmental assessment. Second, the public participation framework is significantly strengthened: a 45-day consultation period (up from the current 20 days), mandatory public hearings in all affected municipalities, and a requirement for developers to provide non-technical summaries in both Macedonian and Albanian. Third, an independent EIA Review Board will be established with experts appointed by the Academy of Sciences, providing technical oversight separate from political decision-making.

Relevance to Skopje Development

Skopje has seen significant construction and development activity in recent years, not all of which has been subject to thorough environmental review. Projects that would be newly captured under the 5M EUR threshold include medium-scale commercial developments, road expansion projects, and industrial facility upgrades. The reforms would also strengthen assessment requirements for projects affecting the Vardar river corridor, Mount Vodno protected area, and the Skopje valley airshed. For citizens, the most significant change is the strengthened public participation requirement: residents will have more time, more information, and more formal opportunities to raise environmental concerns about proposed developments in their neighborhoods.

Current Status and Timeline

The draft legislation was submitted to Parliament in November 2025 and is currently in committee review. The Ministry of Environment has indicated that it expects parliamentary debate to begin in March 2026, with adoption targeted for mid-2026. An 18-month implementation period would follow, meaning the new requirements would become operational by early 2028. The independent EIA Review Board appointment process is expected to take 6 months following adoption. Sustainable Skopje is actively participating in the parliamentary consultation process and will provide updates as the legislation progresses.

What This Means for You

  • More development projects in Skopje will require environmental assessment, increasing environmental protection
  • Citizens will have stronger rights to participate in decisions about projects affecting their neighborhoods
  • Developers should prepare for longer permitting timelines and more rigorous environmental documentation
  • The independent Review Board will provide a check on politically motivated approvals of environmentally harmful projects
  • The online portal will make environmental decision-making more transparent and accessible to all citizens

Further Reading & Resources